Friday, September 28, 2012

Martian Rivers?



NASA's Curiosity Rover has discovered what is thought to be an ancient stream bed on the planet Mars.  Curiosity continues NASA's success with recent Martian exploration.

Click the link below for the full NASA article and high-resolution images.
NASA Article - Curiosity & Streambed

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Vanishing Arctic Ice

During the current melting season, sea ice coverage on the Arctic Ocean reached its all-time recorded low.  This year's low measured even less than the previous record, 2007.

Although many still energetically debate the causes, they cannot ignore the Arctic warmup of the past 10 or so years.

The lower ice coverage will affect marine life (including polar bears - officially a marine mammal) and will further contribute to Arctic warming.

Scientists do not know the cause(s) nor do they know what future changes are in store.

Below is a phenomenal NOAA animation of satellite still images illustrating this year's loss of ice.


Sunday, September 16, 2012

Astronomical Units

Here's an interesting article regarding the redefinition of the AU (astronomical unit).


"Astronomical Unit," or Earth-Sun Distance, Gets an Overhaul

A new AU redefinition involves changing it to a single number rather than basing it on a somewhat baffling equation








 

1
Share




Mars Opposition Artist's concept of Mars opposition on December 24, 2007. The distances between the sun, the planets and the distant nebula are not to scale.Image: NASA Mars Exploration Program

By Geoff Brumfiel of Nature magazine
Without fanfare, astronomers have redefined one of the most important distances in the Solar System. The astronomical unit (au) — the rough distance from the Earth to the Sun — has been transformed from a confusing calculation into a single number. The new standard, adopted in August by unanimous vote at the International Astronomical Union's meeting in Beijing, China, is now 149,597,870,700 meters — no more, no less.
The effect on our planet’s inhabitants will be limited. The Earth will continue to twirl around the Sun, and in the Northern Hemisphere, autumn will soon arrive. But for astronomers, the change means more precise measurements and fewer headaches from explaining the au to their students.
The distance between the Earth and the Sun is one of the most long-standing values in astronomy. The first precise measurement was made in 1672 by the famed astronomer Giovanni Cassini, who observed Mars from Paris, France, while his colleague Jean Richer observed the planet from French Guiana in South America. Taking the parallax, or angular difference, between the two observations, the astronomers calculated the distance from Earth to Mars and used that to find the distance from the Earth to the Sun. Their answer was 140 million kilometers — not far off from today’s value.
Until the last half of the twentieth century, such parallax measurements were the only reliable way to derive distances in the Solar System, and so the au continued to be expressed as a combination of fundamental constants that could transform angular measurements into distance. Most recently, the au was defined as (take a deep breath): “the radius of an unperturbed circular Newtonian orbit about the Sun of a particle having infinitesimal mass, moving with a mean motion of 0.01720209895 radians per day (known as the Gaussian constant)”.
The definition cheered fans of German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss, whose constant sits at the heart of the whole affair, but it caused trouble for astronomers. For one thing, it left introductory astronomy students completely baffled, says Sergei Klioner, an astronomer at the Technical University of Dresden in Germany. But, more importantly, the old definition clashed with Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
As its name implies, general relativity makes space-time relative, depending on where an observer is located. The au, as formerly defined, changed as well. It shifted by a thousand meters or more between Earth’s reference frame and that of Jupiter’s, according to Klioner. That shift did not affect spacecraft, which measure distance directly, but it has been a pain for planetary scientists working on Solar System models.
The Sun posed another problem. The Gaussian constant is based on Solar mass, so the au was inextricably tied to the mass of the Sun. But the Sun is losing mass as it radiates energy, and this was causing the au to change slowly as well.
The revised definition wipes away the problems of the old au. A fixed distance has nothing to do with the Sun’s mass, and the meter is defined as the distance traveled by light in a vacuum in 1 / 299,792,458 of a second. Because the speed of light is constant in all reference frames, the au will no longer change depending on an observer’s location in the Solar System.
Redefining the au has been possible for decades — modern astronomers can use spacecraft, radars and lasers to make direct measurements of distance. But “some of them thought it was a little bit dangerous to change something,” says Nicole Capitaine, an astronomer at the Paris Observatory in France. Some feared the change might disrupt their computer programs, others held a sentimental attachment to the old standard. But after years of lobbying by Capitaine, Klioner and others, the revised unit has finally been adopted.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

We're definitely not in Kansas, Toto...

Although Kansas lies partially in Tornado Alley, USA, we can also have them in many other parts of the country.  Including NY occasionally.  All courtesy of this Saturday's severe weather.


Monday, September 3, 2012

Arctic Sea Ice

The Arctic Ocean's cloak of pack ice has thinned and shrunken during the past 30 years.  However, the Arctic has warmed more than any other part of the globe during that same time frame.  The exact reason still elude scientists.

This summer the Arctic Ocean reached a new milestone.  Read on to find out which one...


As of August 26, Arctic sea ice appears to have broken the 2007 record for smallest daily extent of the satellite era. Arctic sea ice extent fell to 1.58 million square miles on August 26, 2012. This was 27,000 square miles (slightly bigger than the state of West Virginia) below the previous record low of 1.61 million square miles, set in September 2007.
Map of the arctic showing the previous sea ice extent record low in 2007
The official 2012 minimum extent can’t be declared until scientists are sure the summer melt season is over, but the final figure will likely be still lower: there are two to three more weeks left in the melt season, and sea ice continues to track below 2007 daily extents. In the first half of August, ice was melting at a rate of just over 43,000 square miles per day. The pace of ice melt in late August 2012 had slowed to about 29,000 square miles per day, but that was still nearly double the normal rate for this time of year.
Arctic sea ice extent (areas with 15% or more ice cover) on August 26, 2012, based onsatellite data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center. Orange line shows the boundary of the previous record low sea ice extent. (Map by climate.gov team.)
graph of previous arctic sea ice extent record low in 2007 and the new lower record in August 2012
Graph of five-day-mean sea ice extents in the Arctic over the course of the year. On August 26, ice extents fell below the previous record low observed by satellites in September 2007. Graph courtesy National Snow and Ice Data Center’s Arctic Sea Ice News & Analysispage.
In a media advisory issued by the National Snow and Ice Data Center, NSIDC scientist Walt Meier said of the new record low, “By itself it’s just a number, and occasionally records are going to get set. But in the context of what’s happened in the last several years and throughout the satellite record, it’s an indication that the Arctic sea ice cover is fundamentally changing.”
Among the many signs of fundamental change is that ice thickness is declining as fast or faster than area. The Arctic was previously dominated by ice that had survived multiple summer thaws, growing steadily thicker over the years. Today, very little of this old, thick ice remains.
Reviewed by Ted Scambos, National Snow and Ice Data Center.