Monday, August 26, 2013

Smokey the Bear...and the effects



For years, no, decades, the US Forest Service and National Park Service engaged in an extremely successful forest fire prevention campaign.  That campaign used Smokey the Bear to spread the message, "Only you can prevent forest fires."

Well, that prevention campaign was successful, too successful.  It succeeded to the point of allowing a huge buildup of dry fuels in the western United States' forests and national parks.  The conflagration that consumed about 30% of Yellowstone National Park in 1988 was an example of what can happen when there is a lot of tinder dry fuel in the forests coupled with extremely dry weather.  It's been very dry in the west for about the last 12 years now.

In the 1970s and 1980s, scientists began to understand much better the positive role of fire in our western ecosystems.  The Rim Fire that has burned its way into Yosemite National Park is another example of just such a situation.

The linked article from NASA's Earth Observatory has some excellent high resolution images of the Rim Fire and the resulting smoke plume.

NASA Earth Observatory - Rim Fire

Saturday, August 17, 2013

Hubble Scheme


Image Credit: aip.com


Edwin Hubble was a 'pretty bright fellow.'  That's understating it a bit.  haha  In addition to showing that the universe was indeed expanding, he also devised a classification scheme for galaxies.  The linked article from Space.com tells about the recent results of a survey of HST (Hubble Space Telescope) images of galaxies.

Hubble Survey article - Space.com

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Did You See Any Meteors?

I unfortunately did not see a single Perseid meteor this year.  Although the moon could not play spoiler this year, the weather certainly did.  Lots of clouds and high humidity levels did me in.  I hope you were able to see a few, or maybe even many, of this lovely annual astronomical "fireworks" display.

Below is a great article from Scientific American about the Perseids.



A Perseid meteor streaks across the sky over the Very Large Telescope in Chile. Credit: ESO/S. Guisard
A Perseid meteor streaks across the sky over the Very Large Telescope in Chile. Credit: ESO/S. Guisard

The Perseids meteor shower, which peaks August 11-12, isn’t just a dazzling celestial show. The annual event also supplies our atmosphere with an essential ingredient for groundbreaking astronomical research.
Our atmosphere is turbulent. The turbulence is what makes stars twinkle. Although twinkling stars are lovely to look at, they are a bit of a nuisance to astronomers. All that dancing and shimmering obscures the fine detail in planets, nebulae and galaxies. If only they could steady the atmosphere, they could learn so much more about the cosmos. But because the sky refuses to be tamed, scientists do the next best thing: they make their telescope mirrors change shape in tune to the moving atmosphere. This is where the Perseids come in.
During the Perseids, our planet runs into the debris trail of Comet Swift-Tuttle, a ball of ice that orbits the sun every 130 years and last visited the inner solar system in 1992. Every time the comet returns, it sheds flakes of ice and dust. And every year, Earth passes through cometary dandruff. Each comet chunk slams into the upper atmosphere at nearly 60 kilometers per second and flares as a meteor or “shooting star.”
A sodium laser fires from the Gemini South telescope in Chile. Credit: Gemini Observatory/AURA

Every impact shaves a bit of sodium off the meteors. Some of the sodium atoms float in a layer roughly 90 kilometers above Earth’s surface. By firing a telescope-mounted laser into the sky, astronomers can make a spot of the sodium glow. The glowing spot looks like an artificial star. Because astronomers know exactly what a glowing spot should look like, they can then rapidly deform small mirrors in the telescope—sometimes at over a thousand times a second—until the spot appears nice and round. Thus calibrated, the telescope can reveal a far clearer picture of the celestial object of interest than might otherwise be obtained In effect the technique removes the confounding atmosphere. Because the telescope continuously adapts to the changing atmosphere, astronomers call this technique “adaptive optics.”
Adaptive optics systems bring everything from nearby moons to distant galaxy clusters into sharper focus. Astronomers use them to observe stars orbiting the supermassive black hole at the core of our galaxy roughly 28,000 light-years away. By watching stars whip around the galactic center for over a decade, researchers were able to figure out that the black hole weighs the same as 4 million suns. And by combining adaptive optics with a tool to block out starlight, astronomers can take pictures of planets orbiting distant stars in our galaxy—all because of the sodium that meteors bring.
The Perseids will reach full swing–with nearly 100 meteors per hour streaking across the sky–on the night of August 11. The best time to watch is after midnight well away from city lights. With no moon to spoil the view, this year’s show should be a good one. Every meteor you see will be a tiny piece of a comet, a remnant from the birth of our solar system. Each one leaves behind a bit of itself that lets astronomers push the boundaries of our knowledge of the cosmos.

Christopher CrockettAbout the Author: Christopher is a AAAS Mass Media Fellow and intern for Scientific American. In a previous life he was an astronomer and spent the last several years looking for planets. Follow on Twitter @@CosmicThespian

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Coal Ash

I'm all for the utilization of domestic energy sources.  However I just watched the linked mini-documentary about coal ash in Montana, 'big sky country.'  To say it is sobering and thought provoking is an understatement.

What is coal ash? It's the material remaining after coal is burned.  And we generate a lot of it here in the United States.

Here's the link: Coal Ash Documentary - National Geographic

Thursday, August 1, 2013

A 'Hot' Topic


Image credit - NASA

Read on in the linked Scientific American article for the results of a new study on - you guessed it - the greenhouse effect/climate change.

Scientific American article

Monday, July 29, 2013

Kepler Mission at Risk

Sorry for the lack of posts during July.  I've been travelling for over half the month.




NASA's exoplanet-hunting mission, Kepler, has been hampered by faulty gyroscopic wheels.  Mission scientists are not sure what level of performance they might be able to salvage from the solar-orbiting space telescope.

Read on for more...Scientific American Kepler Article

NASA Mission Homepage...NASA - Kepler Home

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Man-made Lava??

Here's a superb article from Wired.com about corium, man-made lava that can only form accidentally during nuclear accidents.

The Most Dangerous (Man-Made) Lava Flow

The surface of an experimentally made corium lava flow. Image: from Journeau et al. (2003), Nuclear Engineering and Design.
One of the things I enjoy most is running across fascinating information when I’m not even looking for it. Case in point, today’s subject. I was doing some research for my class on Fukushima Dai’ichi and Chernobyl when I ran into some references to lava. “Lava?” I thought, “Why are they talking about lava when I thought I was trying to find out about nuclear accidents?” Lo and behold, what do I find but an entire research field that has been making manmade lava for decades. Sure, we’ve seen some of therecent manmade lava flows done at Syracuse University and small-scale lava in experiments for some time, but here I was finding research that involved a ton (literally) of manmade lava … and moreover, these lava have been made by accident on a number of occasions with tragic consequences.
Let’s back up a bit. What I’m talking about here is the result of a meltdown in the core of a nuclear reactor. This is when the nuclear fission reaction occurring within a nuclear reactor is no longer cooled and contained sufficiently to prevent heating of the rods, cases, core containment vessel and anything else nearby, including the concrete floor of the reactor building. When a meltdown begins to occur, as what happened at Chernobyl in 1986 or Fukushima Dai’ichi in 2011, the ability to cool the reactor is insufficient to keep the fuel rods cool, so heat begins to build — and build rapidly. The two most important primary isotopes used in nuclear fission reactions are uranium-235 and plutonium-239, so it is their fission caused by the absorbtion of a neutron into isotopes with even shorter half-lives (like cesium and strontium) are what  produces the heat in the nuclear reactor core. The chain reaction of fission, decays and absorption of the released alpha particles by other atoms is allowed to go unfettered, the heat will build to the point where the fuel rods (made mostly of enriched U, meaning it has more 235U than the natural distribution of 235U) will start to bend and, if the heating is allowed to continue, melt. This is usually controlled by cooling water and control rods that can absorb some of neutrons created by fission and decay. However, if there is a problem, the heat can continues to rise and the fuel rods can become fully molten, that is the “meltdown”. So, in a sense, a meltdown in a nuclear reactor is the accidental production of lava.
Corium lava flow made experimentally. Image: Argonne National Lab.
Now, this lava is, of course, very different than the lava that erupts from a volcano, compositionally. The fuel pellets inside the fuel rods are almost entirely UO2while the fuel rods in which the pellets are placed is made of zirconium alloys. As the fuel rods heat in an accident, they can get hot enough to start bending (close to 700°C) and if the pellets inside the casing touch, they can begin to melt if the temperature reaches ~1200ºC*. The heat can continue building as the fuel rods melt, eventually forming an entirely molten body that is a mix of the UO2 from the fuel pellets and the zirconium alloy of the casing.
If you’re going to design safer nuclear reactor, this is where you need to start getting your hands dirty (well, not literally). How does this “corium” (as it is called) behave — and more importantly, what happens when over components in a reactor come in contact with it? Well, researchers at the Argonne National Lab have created corium in the laboratory in order to see just that (see below). You can check out some great videos of corium lava flowing like pahoehoe (it has an even lower viscosity, which isn’t a surprise as it is at 2000ºC, versus 1100-1200ºC for your average basalt) or crusting over when they pour water over it. This lab used upwards of 1 ton** of UO2 lava in some of their experiments to see how quickly corium might melt through the concrete of a nuclear reactor containment vessel (or building). They found that corium lava can melt upwards of 30 cm (12″) of concrete in 1 hour! This is why it is so important to know if a nuclear reactor accident has gone into true “meltdown” as the corium lava will rapidly melt its way through the inner containment vessels (or more) in a matter of hours unless it can be cooled again. However, results from these CCI (core-concrete interaction) experiments, suggest that cooling with water may not be sufficient to stop corium from melting the concrete. One thing to remember — much of the melting of concrete during a meltdown occurs within minutes to hours, so keeping the core cool is vital for stopping the corium for breaching that containment vessel.
Results of an experiment with corium-concrete interactions. Image: Argonne National Lab.
Corium lava was produced both during the Chernobyl and Fukushima Dai’ichi accidents (along with minor amounts at Three Mile Island). For the latter, TEPCO, the Japanese energy company who ran Fukushima Dai’ichi, claims that the corium didn’t breach the outer wall of the containment vessel (although there is a healthy debate about this). At Chernobyl, there are stunning pictures of corium lavas that melted all the way out of the containment vessel (upwards of 3 meters / 9 feet, see below) — so these lavas have assimilated concrete and whatever else they could melt on their way out of the containment vessel. This assimilation might actually help in solidifying the corium lava as concrete (which is mostly limestone) has a much lower melting point than corium. Assimilate enough concrete, and the corium should solidify with sufficient cooling — although research is ongoing about what might be the best composition of concrete for reactors.
Corium lava (solid in the image) that melted through the basement of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor in 1986.
So, why is corium so dangerous? Well, even long after the flow has stopped, that lava will be highly radioactive for decades to centuries (along with the surrounding countryside if radioactive material made it out of the containment vessel) as the various radioactive materials in the lava decay. In fact, we don’t even have pictures of the corium lava from Fukushima Dai’ichi due to the high levels of radioactivity near the reactor. Instead, measures of radioactivity and gases released from the cooled reactor have been used to model how far the melting of the concrete might have proceeded. In some models, the corium made its way through 0.6 meters (2 feet) of the containment vessel’s concrete. Again, cooling the lava by dumping water into the reactor along with assimilation of concrete likely stopped this corium lava flow.
Corium is clearly a rare thing — produced only when humans put a large amount of highly radioactive isotopes together to start of chain reaction. There have been studies that claim that “natural” nuclear reactors (potentially at multiple times) have existed in the Earth’s past — and heck, the dominant source of heat within the Earth comes from the decay of U, thorium and potassium. However, I find it fascinating that manmade lavas have wreaked havoc at least 3 times in the past century as we grapple with how to produce enough energy for the growing demands of the planet. Equally fascinating are the controlled experiments that have tried to come up with ways that we can harness nuclear power more safely, all with these manmade corium lavas.
* This is a great example of eutectic melting, where melting begins in places where the two substances touch. The same thing happens when you melt rocks.
** If you do the math, 1 ton of UO2 is actually only about 0.08 m3 of UO2. Still, I wouldn’t want that in my office.